The recent study from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis has stirred the pot, suggesting Bitcoin might be a thorn in the side of government fiscal policies. The researchers propose a bold solution: slap a hefty tax on Bitcoin or outright ban it.
According to them, Bitcoin creates serious challenges for governments, particularly when maintaining a “permanent primary deficit” – a situation where government spending always exceeds its revenue without factoring in interest payments on debt.
Don’t Miss:
In their paper, the researchers claim that Bitcoin, being a decentralized digital currency, competes with government-issued securities, making it harder for governments to manage their finances.
“A legal prohibition against Bitcoin can restore unique implementation of permanent primary deficits and so can a tax on Bitcoin,” they argue. That’s a mouthful, but essentially, they’re saying Bitcoin’s very existence forces governments to face fiscal realities they’d rather avoid. It’s like tugging a leaky boat while the waves keep crashing in.
See Also: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O’Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are using this platform to create customized gold IRAs to help shield their savings from inflation and economic turbulence.
As of 2024, the U.S. primary deficit is $1.8 trillion and the national debt is a staggering $35.7 trillion. The researchers suggest this deficit can be sustained indefinitely – so long as something like Bitcoin doesn’t mess up the balance. The paper describes Bitcoin as “useless pieces of paper,” given that it’s not backed by any real resources.
While government securities aren’t tangible, they influence nominal interest rates, which governments can control via monetary policy. Conversely, Bitcoin is like an unruly guest at a carefully planned dinner, throwing the whole event off-kilter.
Trending: This Adobe-backed AI marketing startup went from a $5 to $85 million valuation working with brands like L’Oréal, Hasbro, and Sweetgreen in just three years – here’s how there’s an opportunity to invest at $1,000 for only $0.50/share today.
“When there are laws against private-sector bubble assets, it is easy for the government to design policies that uniquely implement a permanent primary deficit,” the researchers continue, hinting that if Bitcoin is left unchecked, it could wreck the delicate balance of deficit financing. They suggest a high enough tax might be sufficient without resorting to an outright ban.
Story Continues
This isn’t the first time such concerns have arisen. Bitcoin is undeniably speculative and this speculation has created an uneven playing field. A small group controls most of the Bitcoin supply, concentrating wealth among top holders. Research supports this, with the Gini coefficient – an indicator of inequality – showing extreme levels for Bitcoin.
Similarly, the European Central Bank (ECB) recently echoed similar sentiments, suggesting that Bitcoin’s rising value exacerbates wealth inequality. Early adopters get rich, while latecomers are left holding the bag.
Read Next:
UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
This article Is Bitcoin A Dangerous Economic Threat? Minneapolis Fed Researchers Propose Heavy Taxation Or Outright Banning As A Solution originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.